PostAndRape

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 18 November 2012

The Twinkie Defense*

Posted on 21:13 by Unknown







The Hostess bankruptcy case is an excellent chance for all of us to get in on the ground floor into the fact/factoid elevator/lift!  Because in a very, very short time you can tell a person's political stance from what that person believes the reason for the bankruptcy must be.  That's my prediction, unless strong evidence pointing to a single main cause crops up shortly.

This article gives you the basics:

Irving, Texas-based Hostess filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January for the second time in less than a decade. Its predecessor company, Interstate Bakeries, sought bankruptcy protection in 2004 and changed its name to Hostess after emerging in 2009.
The company said it was saddled with costs related to its unionized workforce. The company had been contributing $100 million a year in pension costs for workers; the new contract offer would’ve slashed that to $25 million a year, in addition to wage cuts and a 17 percent reduction in health benefits.
Management missteps were another problem. Hostess came under fire this spring after it was revealed that nearly a dozen executives received pay hikes of up to 80 percent last year even as the company was struggling.

Republicans are going to go for the unions as the evil destroyer, Democrats probably for the evil management missteps which were, nevertheless, rewarded.

I haven't done the necessary research to say anything more meaningful about the causes of the bankruptcy, although selling something akin to the dwarf bread in Terry Pratchett's fantasy books might be a biiiig part of company's troubles, given that people are getting more health conscious and so on.

Sorry for the aside.  The point is that there's a very narrow window before the beliefs about a particular event ossify**.  Sorta like Twinkies.   This happened with the mortgage crisis, for example, so that after some time had passed it was impossible to agree on the facts of the case across the political aisle.

-------
*The title is based on the legal use of this term.   Twinkies are one of the products of the bankrupt company.
**Might not happen with this example, but it happens a lot recently, and that fact/factoid ossification makes real debate about many political issues essentially impossible.  It's as if we all have our separate holy books.



Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Do Not Be Afraid Of Life. Echidne's Poetry Hour.
    A musical adaptation of Kaarlo Sarkia 's poem: A rough translation of the lyrics (by me and without the rhyme): Do not be afraid of lif...
  • Speed Blogging, Monday August 12, 20013: On Media, Fracking, Gender and Death Panels.
    Today's funny cartoon .  As you may note, I'm still frustrated about the collapsed anthill aspect of public debate. But it's ...
  • Speed Blogging, Mon 9/16/2013: On Women
    Note:  Not all these are from the last few days. First , the Taliban in Afghanistan is waging a physical war against women in the public sec...
  • A Meta-Post On Income Inequality
    Or utterly weird.  You decide.  This post is based on some pictures I have on my desktop and my desire to randomly pick two of them and writ...
  • Yellen vs. Summers As A Metaphor
    Atrios posted on the nomination of the next chief of Federal Reserve.  The forerunners have been defined as Lawrence Summers and Janet Yelle...
  • Speed Blogging, Fri Sep 6, 2013: On Exclusion, Reproduction, Legos and Elections.
    1.  Worth reading:  How Women's Voices Were Excluded from the March on Washington.  This is not uncommon in any social justice movement...
  • Polling Conspiracies
    I once wrote a bad poem about Conspiracy Theories.  It began like this: There are five fat men in a secret  cave somewhere. They are naked. ...
  • Never Thin Enough? Thoughts About What We Can Sell in the Labor Market.
    Content Warning:  Body Images and Anorexia Joan Smith in the UK Independent reviews The Vogue Factor , a book about the eating requirements...
  • On Pax Dickinson. And A Little on James Taranto.
    Here's where I go wrong.  Dickinson was, until today, working for the Business Insider.  He is pretty well known as an eager anti-femini...
  • Speed-Blogging, June 27, 2013
    First, American Apparel advertises its unisex shirts rather interestingly.   Several photo series show women with bare bottoms.  Those wome...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (365)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (35)
    • ►  June (44)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (44)
  • ▼  2012 (135)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ▼  November (37)
      • Friday Fluff
      • The Slave Privilege List
      • The Baby Dearth. HELP!
      • What's Wrong With These Republican Guys?
      • Epistemic Closure Among Conservatives. Or How Bru...
      • On Trash
      • The New War on Men. Women's Fault.
      • Today's Funny Pictures
      • The Light-And-Frothy Post: Turkeys and Thanksgiving
      • Good News on Gender Bias In Politics. It's Gettin...
      • Why Is Feminism 'A Dirty Word?'
      • Funny Protest Signs
      • No Women Bishops in the Church of England
      • Something Nice For Today
      • Today's Good Health News
      • Decoding David Brooks
      • A Public Information Alert
      • Sarah Palin for the Republican Presidential Candid...
      • The Twinkie Defense*
      • What Happens When A Misogynist Takes Over A Newspa...
      • An American Feminist Literary Canon - A Guest Post...
      • The Greatest Mystery Of The Last US Elections?
      • Things I Hate About Writing
      • Fun Watching For Today: Fox News and Women, Nancy...
      • Meanwhile, in Ireland, Savita Halappanavar Dies Af...
      • Why Do Powerful Men Cheat? The Petraeus Chronicles.
      • The Petraeus Puzzle
      • Senator Ron Johnson Mansplains to Senator-Elect Ta...
      • This Blog Is Nine Years Old Today
      • Mr. Stable Vs. Mr. Sexy. More Evolutionary Psycho...
      • My Election Thoughts: On Voting Gaps, Mandates an...
      • While You Wait For The Results
      • Destroying the Fabric of Democracy
      • Baumeister and Vohs: Women Were Never Excluded Fr...
      • A Guest Post by Anna: Literary Canon of American ...
      • The Thing About Mitt. Or Why You Should Not Vote ...
      • The Mysteries
    • ►  October (54)
    • ►  September (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile