PostAndRape

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 25 March 2013

Today's Study Popularization for Mothers! Fun.

Posted on 11:43 by Unknown

It is about a study which finds that infants are introduced to solid foods too early if the comparison is to expert advice on when that should happen.  But forget about the topic for a while and just focus on the interesting question who it is who is being talked to here and in what tone:

Moms Serve Up Solid Food Too Soon, Study Finds

Many mothers in the U.S. start infants on solid foods -- including peanut butter, meat, and french fries -- earlier than experts recommend, and half of them do so with their doctor's support, according to new research from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The study found that 40.4 percent of U.S. mothers interviewed from 2005 to 2007 said they introduced solid foods to infants before they were 4 months old -- that represents an increase of about 29 percent from earlier studies, the researchers reported today in the journal Pediatrics.

More than half of the mothers (55 percent) cited a doctor's advice as one of the reasons for introducing solids before 4 months.
"With multiple sources of information on infant feeding and care from healthcare providers, family, friends, and media, specific information on the timing of solid food introduction may be conflicting and not necessarily sensitive to the needs of mothers," the authors said.
Among mothers who introduced solid foods earlier than 4 months, the mean age of the children at introduction was 11.8 weeks, and 9.1 percent of early introducers gave solids to infants younger than 4 weeks, they added.
The authors noted that if they factored in the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) 2012 feeding recommendation to avoid giving solid foods until 6 months, 92.9 percent of their analytic sample would have been "early introducers."

The bolds are mine.

Most of the stuff that irritates me in this write-up is subtle but it is still worth noticing because it is almost universal.  First, the title tells us that "moms" serve up solid food too soon.  The "moms" is not quite defined anywhere in the summary, though reading it makes me assume that these were mothers who had infants between 2005 and 2007.

But the headline says "moms."  Because the majority of women are mothers, the headline appears to speak to the majority of women and tells them that they are doing it wrong. 

Second, I really, really doubt that feeding four-month-old babies peanut butter, meat or french fries was something the doctors supported.  Indeed, I doubt that feeding those food items to small babies was anything but very rare in the study.   I may be wrong as I haven't dug up the study yet, but honest, most people, whether mothers or not, know that babies shouldn't be eating french fries.  They don't have teeth, for one thing.

Thus, that bit was added to hint that "these" mothers are just dreadful people, where you can insert whatever your definition of a mother might be into that little word in quotation marks.

Third, comparing what mothers of infants between 2005 and 2007 did to recommendations that came out in 2012 is kinda unfair.  The relevant comparison is to recommendations that existed between 2005 and 2007, if we wish to know whether mothers of infants and their doctors follow such recommendations.

The popularization then argues that pediatricians and other relevant doctors may not have sufficient information about recommended feeding of infants which is a valid point.  But this also irritated me, apparently from the study itself:

Healthcare providers might be as equally confused about infant feeding guidelines as mothers, the authors wrote, saying some clinicians "may rely on their own infant feeding experience rather than evidence-based guidelines when counseling women."

That looks like a speculation, not something the study unearthed, and because we are told that "moms" are the ones making the feeding mistakes, the odds are that those clinicians are "moms", too.

Then there is this bit, where the numbers just don't seem to add up to 100%  however hard I try:

Among early introducers, 52.7 percent exclusively formula-fed their infants; 50.2 percent mixed formula with breastfeeding, and 24.3 percent only breastfed.
 Whatever was supposed to be in that sentence, being sloppy about supposedly important research findings isn't helpful for the reader.





Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Speed Blogging, Mon 9/16/2013: On Women
    Note:  Not all these are from the last few days. First , the Taliban in Afghanistan is waging a physical war against women in the public sec...
  • On the Skill Gap: Aren't US Workers Good Enough?
    The skill gap argument:  That US workers no longer have the skills US firms require,  is an interesting one .   The argument places the blam...
  • And Even More Gun News
    These news seem to have turned into a series, all about the problems with a gun nation.  It's not a polite nation and it's not a saf...
  • The Mysteries
    Life is full of mysteries.  One of the more minor ones for me is to ask why I have just spent what amounts to a full working day reading and...
  • On Forced Fatherhood
    Laurie Shrage has written a blog post on the New York Times Opinionator blog on the question whether men now have fewer reproductive right...
  • On Twitter
    It's bad for me.  I don't get what I'm supposed to do with it, for marketing purposes, and my brain tries to fathom every single...
  • Speed Blogging, Monday August 12, 20013: On Media, Fracking, Gender and Death Panels.
    Today's funny cartoon .  As you may note, I'm still frustrated about the collapsed anthill aspect of public debate. But it's ...
  • On Sexual Assaults in the US Military
    A topic on which Powerful People (US Senators) are pontificating right now : Sometimes one picture really does tell more than a thousand wor...
  • Do Not Be Afraid Of Life. Echidne's Poetry Hour.
    A musical adaptation of Kaarlo Sarkia 's poem: A rough translation of the lyrics (by me and without the rhyme): Do not be afraid of lif...
  • Diversity on Evening Cable News
    Media Matters for America has studied it.  The results are as expected (white and male is the main flavor in the diversity soup)  but also ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (365)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (35)
    • ►  June (44)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ▼  March (39)
      • Wisconsin And Work
      • Tougher Skin, Please
      • Games People Play. With Universities And Science.
      • Defending Marriage
      • Good Dancing
      • Airbags For Bicyclists
      • Today's Blogging Thoughts
      • Stuff To Read on Women
      • Money Makes The World Go Around? In American Poli...
      • What Price On A Woman's Life in North Dakota?
      • Today's Study Popularization for Mothers! Fun.
      • Friday Fun
      • Meanwhile, in Kansas and North Dakota
      • More on the UN Commission on The Status of Women
      • Is Violence Ever The Proper Response? Thoughts Ab...
      • Fun With Christina Hoff Sommers
      • Some News on Violence Against Women
      • Brainless Politics. The Cyprus Example and Others
      • Feminism Is Dead. Take 4358.
      • The Rape Culture Inside CNN. We Are All Steubenvi...
      • A Liberal Plant?
      • The Hand That Rocks The Cradle
      • Kudos To Sara Volz
      • The New Pope
      • On Crime And Aging
      • Writer's Block. Or The Vida Counts.
      • Women's Role in The Selection of The New Pope
      • And The Other Side Reacts to the International Wom...
      • On The International Women's Day, 2013
      • A Meta-Post On Income Inequality
      • Good News/Bad News On Violence Against Women
      • Gaming While Female
      • How To Fight Politely
      • Funny Feminist Stuff For Tuesday
      • Divorce, Iowa-Style?
      • On Leaning-In And Sheryl Sandberg. Or Leaning-Away.
      • An Odd Coincidence: Mark Sandford and Empathy
      • Just For Fun
      • Friday Reading
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (44)
  • ►  2012 (135)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ►  October (54)
    • ►  September (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile