PostAndRape

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 13 September 2013

Bullying Beats Anti-Bullying Programs?

Posted on 15:39 by Unknown

That's what I read here:

Anti-bullying initiatives have become standard at schools across the country, but a new UT Arlington study finds that students attending those schools may be more likely to be a victim of bullying than children at schools without such programs.
The findings run counter to the common perception that bullying prevention programs can help protect kids from repeated harassment or physical and emotional attacks.
"One possible reason for this is that the students who are victimizing their peers have learned the language from these anti-bullying campaigns and programs," said Seokjin Jeong, an assistant professor of criminology and criminal justice at UT Arlington and lead author of the study, which was published in the Journal of Criminology.
Even the title of the summary is all about that: 

Youth More Likely to Be Bullied at Schools With Anti-Bullying Programs

The writing carefully avoids mentioning explicit causality, but the impression the reader gets is that the anti-bullying programs don't work.

And that can be the case.  However, if you read through the actual study you will find a different reason:  The data the study uses is cross-sectional, meaning that all the researchers can compare are data from the same time period.  So schools with anti-bullying programs can be compared with schools which don't have them, and that's the comparison the summary talks about.

Why is that a problem?  Because we don't know if the schools with anti-bullying programs had the same levels of bullying as other schools, before the programs were introduced.  Perhaps the schools with programs introduced them explicitly because bullying was so bad?  Perhaps the levels of bullying in those schools now are lower than they were before the programs?  Or perhaps not.  The point is that we cannot tell, because the researchers didn't have data over time, only data from one harvesting of information.

Yet it makes sense that schools with or without such programs might differ in other important ways, such as the level of reported bullying.

A second (though smaller) problem is that having anti-bullying programs can make students more aware of the fact that they are being bullied, because it gives the language for expressing bullying.  It's a bit like more people reporting rape after society changes its views on rape and punishes it more severely, even if rape rates are not rising.

I should note that the study itself covers lots of ground and does point out the lack of time-series data.



Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Speed Blogging, Mon 9/16/2013: On Women
    Note:  Not all these are from the last few days. First , the Taliban in Afghanistan is waging a physical war against women in the public sec...
  • On the Skill Gap: Aren't US Workers Good Enough?
    The skill gap argument:  That US workers no longer have the skills US firms require,  is an interesting one .   The argument places the blam...
  • And Even More Gun News
    These news seem to have turned into a series, all about the problems with a gun nation.  It's not a polite nation and it's not a saf...
  • The Mysteries
    Life is full of mysteries.  One of the more minor ones for me is to ask why I have just spent what amounts to a full working day reading and...
  • On Forced Fatherhood
    Laurie Shrage has written a blog post on the New York Times Opinionator blog on the question whether men now have fewer reproductive right...
  • On Twitter
    It's bad for me.  I don't get what I'm supposed to do with it, for marketing purposes, and my brain tries to fathom every single...
  • Speed Blogging, Monday August 12, 20013: On Media, Fracking, Gender and Death Panels.
    Today's funny cartoon .  As you may note, I'm still frustrated about the collapsed anthill aspect of public debate. But it's ...
  • On Sexual Assaults in the US Military
    A topic on which Powerful People (US Senators) are pontificating right now : Sometimes one picture really does tell more than a thousand wor...
  • Speed Blogging, Fri Sep 6, 2013: On Exclusion, Reproduction, Legos and Elections.
    1.  Worth reading:  How Women's Voices Were Excluded from the March on Washington.  This is not uncommon in any social justice movement...
  • Do Not Be Afraid Of Life. Echidne's Poetry Hour.
    A musical adaptation of Kaarlo Sarkia 's poem: A rough translation of the lyrics (by me and without the rhyme): Do not be afraid of lif...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (365)
    • ▼  September (20)
      • Speed Blogging, Mon 9/16/2013: On Women
      • The Language Of The Class Wars
      • Friday Echidne Thoughts
      • Bullying Beats Anti-Bullying Programs?
      • Yellen vs. Summers As A Metaphor
      • Those Discouraged Young Men Who Live in Their Pare...
      • Silly Stuff
      • Patriarchy Is Dead. Long Live Patriarchy!
      • On Pax Dickinson. And A Little on James Taranto.
      • Peeling the War Onion
      • Titstare!
      • Today's Action Alert
      • Speed Blogging, Fri Sep 6, 2013: On Exclusion, Re...
      • Going For Chinese Food Tonight?
      • On Blog Comments
      • The Blogger's Rush Hour, Nokia and Rubber Boots
      • The New Washington Post And Rape Apologists
      • On Striking Syria. Questions.
      • Why Women Shouldn't Conduct Orchestras
      • What's Sauce for The Goose Is Not Sauce For The Ga...
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (35)
    • ►  June (44)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (44)
  • ►  2012 (135)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ►  October (54)
    • ►  September (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile