PostAndRape

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

Binders Full of Women. Or on the Second Presidential Debate.

Posted on 13:54 by Unknown

Did you watch the second presidential debate?   I couldn't get to it until today.  What's hard about that delay is trying not to "pre-hear"  how those zillions of external judges rated the two contestants in style and difficulty and truthiness points.   I mostly managed to cover my ears and go tralalala-can't-hear-you  but not quite.  Thus, I heard that Obama did better and might even have won those style points, before I watched the video.

And better he did. 

Now about the contents:  The "binders full of women" is obviously the bit I should discuss here.  It cropped up because of this question from Katherine Fenton in the audience:
In what new ways to you intend to rectify the inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females making only 72 percent of what their male counterparts earn?

Fenton, by the way, was attacked at a conservative site.   That's not kosher, in my view.  Are we now going to do a search on every person asking questions and spread the findings on the clothes lines all over the Internet?  There's a point in making sure that the questions don't come from insiders in either campaign but other than that?  It's just gross, and might make people hesitant about presenting questions altogether.

In any case, and without going on a long side-track about the contents of Fenton's question (see my Gender Gap series for more details), Romney in his answer brought up his record as the governor of Massachusetts:

Thank you. And important topic, and one which I learned a great deal about, particularly as I was serving as governor of my state, because I had the chance to pull together a cabinet and all the applicants seemed to be men.

I went to a number of women's groups and said, "Can you help us find folks," and they brought us whole binders full of women.
I was proud of the fact that after I staffed my Cabinet and my senior staff, that the University of New York in Albany did a survey of all 50 states, and concluded that mine had more women in senior leadership positions than any other state in America.
 But David Bernstein at the Boston Phoenix writes that Romney didn't initiate this process:


What actually happened was that in 2002 -- prior to the election, not even knowing yet whether it would be a Republican or Democratic administration -- a bipartisan group of women in Massachusetts formed MassGAP to address the problem of few women in senior leadership positions in state government. There were more than 40 organizations involved with the Massachusetts Women's Political Caucus (also bipartisan) as the lead sponsor.
They did the research and put together the binder full of women qualified for all the different cabinet positions, agency heads, and authorities and commissions. They presented this binder to Governor Romney when he was elected.

 Bernstein also notes that while Romney's record of hiring women was good in comparison to what went on in the other states, he appointed women to run those parts of the state government he didn't care about, and

Secondly, a UMass-Boston study found that the percentage of senior-level appointed positions held by women actually declined throughout the Romney administration, from 30.0% prior to his taking office, to 29.7% in July 2004, to 27.6% near the end of his term in November 2006. (It then began rapidly rising when Deval Patrick took office.)

I was enjoying the two candidates telling us how they were the best-friends-forever to all those undecided women voters out there.  It's one of the few times in a decade that something like that happens!  Never mind if the emotions are real or not, that show was kinda fun to watch:  Two newly recruited feminist guys...

This doesn't mean that there's no difference between the platforms of Romney and Obama when it comes to issues that matter more to women than men,  on average.  If Obama has somewhat neglected those issues during his term, Romney would not neglect them, nosirr! 

He'd actively pursue and chase every single fundamental Christian belief about women's reproductive rights, starting with his promise to put back the global gag rule on abortion, and he'd actively ignore supporting any attempts to make sex discrimination at workplaces harder.












Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Yellen vs. Summers As A Metaphor
    Atrios posted on the nomination of the next chief of Federal Reserve.  The forerunners have been defined as Lawrence Summers and Janet Yelle...
  • The New Pope
    Is Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the former archbishop of Buenos Aires, who takes the name Pope Francis.  He is the first non-European Pop...
  • Speed Blogging, Mon 9/16/2013: On Women
    Note:  Not all these are from the last few days. First , the Taliban in Afghanistan is waging a physical war against women in the public sec...
  • More Bad News From India
    Content note:  Sexual violence The victim of the Delhi gang rape is extremely ill at a Singapore hospital where she was airlifted a few day...
  • Those Discouraged Young Men Who Live in Their Parents' Basement
    Something interesting from Pew Research on the possibility that young men are now so discouraged and effeminate because of feminism that the...
  • Do Not Be Afraid Of Life. Echidne's Poetry Hour.
    A musical adaptation of Kaarlo Sarkia 's poem: A rough translation of the lyrics (by me and without the rhyme): Do not be afraid of lif...
  • Polling Conspiracies
    I once wrote a bad poem about Conspiracy Theories.  It began like this: There are five fat men in a secret  cave somewhere. They are naked. ...
  • Never Thin Enough? Thoughts About What We Can Sell in the Labor Market.
    Content Warning:  Body Images and Anorexia Joan Smith in the UK Independent reviews The Vogue Factor , a book about the eating requirements...
  • While You Wait For The Results
    In the US federal elections,  you can watch this slide show of  American women voting in earlier elections (via Hecate ).    I assume that...
  • If I Close The Tap Will Water Stop Running? The Texas Birth Control Experiment.
    A peculiar thing happened in Texas!  Its lawmakers decided to do away with funding Planned Parenthood for political forced-birth reasons, ev...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (365)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (35)
    • ►  June (44)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (44)
  • ▼  2012 (135)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ▼  October (54)
      • Baumeister and Vohs Build A Market For Sex. PART 2.
      • Roy F. Baumeister and Kathleen D. Vohs: Is There ...
      • Without Power
      • You are Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't
      • Mood: Stormy
      • On the 2012 US Presidential Elections
      • An Additional Short Post on The Wimminz-Vote-Their...
      • A Guest Post by Anna: A Feminist Literary Canon, P...
      • On Rape And Republican Politicians
      • The Tasteless New York Times
      • Women Vote Their Hormones: The Study Itself
      • The Second Bad Research (and) Popularization Today...
      • Today's First Bad Study Popularization
      • Today's Fun Table
      • About Richard Mourdock. May Trigger.
      • The Topic No-One Dared To Raise in the Presidentia...
      • Casual Sex. A Post on the Meaning of Terms.
      • And More About The Republican-Women-Are-Hot Study
      • Today's Fun Research Popularization: Conservative...
      • What War on Women? Republicans Love Women!
      • A Guest Post by Anna: A Feminist Literary Canon, P...
      • Let's Just All Get Incorporated, Then!
      • The Most Hilarious Class Warfare Piece Ever!
      • The Value of Midwives?
      • Caterpillars and Left-Handed Irishmen. The Republ...
      • Paper, Scissors, Rock
      • Telling Your Workers Which Presidential Candidate ...
      • Political Fluff in The Second Presidential Debate
      • Today's Weird Feminist Political Themes, Growing F...
      • Binders Full of Women. Or on the Second President...
      • This Is Fun. The Details of Romney's Tax Plan
      • Chrystia Freeland on the Plutocrats
      • There's Nothing Worse Than A Bunch of Mean, Hatefu...
      • Ann Coulter on Biden's Debate Performance
      • This Is Funny: Rosie Perez on The Disadvantages R...
      • A Guest Post by Anna: A Feminist Literary Canon, P...
      • Reading for Thinking, on Saturday
      • Romney v. Obama: Such Feistiness! Ryan v. Biden:...
      • Did You Sleep Your Way To The Top? And Other Jour...
      • Voting is Not Like Buying A Pair of Shoes or A New...
      • The Shooting of Malala Yousafzai
      • A Dog Post
      • Romney Leads on Women's Issues --- Back to the Nin...
      • The Polling Games!
      • Julia Gillard, the PM of Australia, Talks About Mi...
      • Truth Is Weirder Than Fiction. Or On What Some Co...
      • Conspiracies in the Labor Department!
      • Today's Funny Picture
      • I Haven't Posted This One For A While
      • The First Presidential Debate. ZZZZZ.
      • NononoNO. She Gets It Wrong.
      • What's For Breakfast? A Brand's Reputation!
      • Thanks, Distance Readers
      • Technology Sucks And Other Blog News
    • ►  September (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile