PostAndRape

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 10 October 2012

The Shooting of Malala Yousafzai

Posted on 16:20 by Unknown

It was carried out by the Taliban in Pakistan (or at least they took credit for it).  Malala Yousafzai is fourteen years old and an activist for girls' education.  The Taliban explains:

Public fury seems to have built up as the country's rolling news channels devoted considerable attention to the story and the Taliban announced they would make another attempt on her life if she survived.
Perhaps conscious of what one media pundit described as a "major PR disaster" for the Taliban, the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) circulated a lengthy statement that tried to justify the assassination with references to Islamic history and the Qur'an.
It said that although the TTP did not believe in attacking women, it was obliged to kill anyone "whosever leads campaign against Islam and sharia" and that her main crime was "because of her pioneer role in preaching secularism and so-called enlightened moderation".
It also said that Yousafzai had been guilty of inviting Muslims to hate the mujahideen, as the insurgents style themselves.
Yousafzai, who won Pakistan's first peace prize for her efforts, did indeed speak out against the Taliban, initially on a blog published under a pseudonym on the BBC Urdu service website. There she chronicled the terror of life in Swat when the area was being fought over by the Taliban and the government. Later she spoke confidently in public against extremism and spoke of her desire to enter national politics.

As a consequence of this shooting, Pakistan has erupted in anger against the Taliban,  the New York Times and other newspapers report.

It's useful to ask what the Taliban's real motives in the shooting were.  The religious explanations it offers  can be debated, even within the circle of Islamic scholars.  But of course they are on some level intricately bound with the need to control women because that control is necessary for the control of the next generation.

Whether the term "misogyny" adequately covers such opinions or whether we need a more specific term I cannot tell.  But I certainly agree that the desire to keep women uneducated has its roots deeply entangled with misogyny.

And no, this particular attack cannot be justified as a response to Western drones killing innocent civilians, horrible as it is.  Malala Yousafzai is not the person who caused that to happen.  Indeed, she is still a child and a Pakistani child at that.

Based on the most recent news I could find, Malala Yousafzai had emergency surgery to remove the bullet and her condition has stabilized.



Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Do Not Be Afraid Of Life. Echidne's Poetry Hour.
    A musical adaptation of Kaarlo Sarkia 's poem: A rough translation of the lyrics (by me and without the rhyme): Do not be afraid of lif...
  • Speed Blogging, Monday August 12, 20013: On Media, Fracking, Gender and Death Panels.
    Today's funny cartoon .  As you may note, I'm still frustrated about the collapsed anthill aspect of public debate. But it's ...
  • Speed Blogging, Mon 9/16/2013: On Women
    Note:  Not all these are from the last few days. First , the Taliban in Afghanistan is waging a physical war against women in the public sec...
  • A Meta-Post On Income Inequality
    Or utterly weird.  You decide.  This post is based on some pictures I have on my desktop and my desire to randomly pick two of them and writ...
  • Yellen vs. Summers As A Metaphor
    Atrios posted on the nomination of the next chief of Federal Reserve.  The forerunners have been defined as Lawrence Summers and Janet Yelle...
  • Speed Blogging, Fri Sep 6, 2013: On Exclusion, Reproduction, Legos and Elections.
    1.  Worth reading:  How Women's Voices Were Excluded from the March on Washington.  This is not uncommon in any social justice movement...
  • Polling Conspiracies
    I once wrote a bad poem about Conspiracy Theories.  It began like this: There are five fat men in a secret  cave somewhere. They are naked. ...
  • Never Thin Enough? Thoughts About What We Can Sell in the Labor Market.
    Content Warning:  Body Images and Anorexia Joan Smith in the UK Independent reviews The Vogue Factor , a book about the eating requirements...
  • On Pax Dickinson. And A Little on James Taranto.
    Here's where I go wrong.  Dickinson was, until today, working for the Business Insider.  He is pretty well known as an eager anti-femini...
  • Speed-Blogging, June 27, 2013
    First, American Apparel advertises its unisex shirts rather interestingly.   Several photo series show women with bare bottoms.  Those wome...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (365)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (35)
    • ►  June (44)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (44)
  • ▼  2012 (135)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ▼  October (54)
      • Baumeister and Vohs Build A Market For Sex. PART 2.
      • Roy F. Baumeister and Kathleen D. Vohs: Is There ...
      • Without Power
      • You are Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't
      • Mood: Stormy
      • On the 2012 US Presidential Elections
      • An Additional Short Post on The Wimminz-Vote-Their...
      • A Guest Post by Anna: A Feminist Literary Canon, P...
      • On Rape And Republican Politicians
      • The Tasteless New York Times
      • Women Vote Their Hormones: The Study Itself
      • The Second Bad Research (and) Popularization Today...
      • Today's First Bad Study Popularization
      • Today's Fun Table
      • About Richard Mourdock. May Trigger.
      • The Topic No-One Dared To Raise in the Presidentia...
      • Casual Sex. A Post on the Meaning of Terms.
      • And More About The Republican-Women-Are-Hot Study
      • Today's Fun Research Popularization: Conservative...
      • What War on Women? Republicans Love Women!
      • A Guest Post by Anna: A Feminist Literary Canon, P...
      • Let's Just All Get Incorporated, Then!
      • The Most Hilarious Class Warfare Piece Ever!
      • The Value of Midwives?
      • Caterpillars and Left-Handed Irishmen. The Republ...
      • Paper, Scissors, Rock
      • Telling Your Workers Which Presidential Candidate ...
      • Political Fluff in The Second Presidential Debate
      • Today's Weird Feminist Political Themes, Growing F...
      • Binders Full of Women. Or on the Second President...
      • This Is Fun. The Details of Romney's Tax Plan
      • Chrystia Freeland on the Plutocrats
      • There's Nothing Worse Than A Bunch of Mean, Hatefu...
      • Ann Coulter on Biden's Debate Performance
      • This Is Funny: Rosie Perez on The Disadvantages R...
      • A Guest Post by Anna: A Feminist Literary Canon, P...
      • Reading for Thinking, on Saturday
      • Romney v. Obama: Such Feistiness! Ryan v. Biden:...
      • Did You Sleep Your Way To The Top? And Other Jour...
      • Voting is Not Like Buying A Pair of Shoes or A New...
      • The Shooting of Malala Yousafzai
      • A Dog Post
      • Romney Leads on Women's Issues --- Back to the Nin...
      • The Polling Games!
      • Julia Gillard, the PM of Australia, Talks About Mi...
      • Truth Is Weirder Than Fiction. Or On What Some Co...
      • Conspiracies in the Labor Department!
      • Today's Funny Picture
      • I Haven't Posted This One For A While
      • The First Presidential Debate. ZZZZZ.
      • NononoNO. She Gets It Wrong.
      • What's For Breakfast? A Brand's Reputation!
      • Thanks, Distance Readers
      • Technology Sucks And Other Blog News
    • ►  September (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile